<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Mass Customization Isn&#8217;t Mainstream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream</link>
	<description>Putting the "Custom" Back In Customer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gucci bag</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>gucci bag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>don’t believe any of these twelve hypotheses are permanent barriers to adoption. If anything they are opportunities for passionate entrepreneurs who want to bring the innovation in software to the physical world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don’t believe any of these twelve hypotheses are permanent barriers to adoption. If anything they are opportunities for passionate entrepreneurs who want to bring the innovation in software to the physical world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>I have read studies that suggest that consumers have way too many choices these days, and it can sometimes negatively affect their purchase, or lack thereof due to too many choices.  Customization may add another layer to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read studies that suggest that consumers have way too many choices these days, and it can sometimes negatively affect their purchase, or lack thereof due to too many choices.  Customization may add another layer to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suze</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Suze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-996</guid>
		<description>This just adds so many more choices for the consumer, that it could be overkill.  You already have to choose size, color, options, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just adds so many more choices for the consumer, that it could be overkill.  You already have to choose size, color, options, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Flaherty</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Flaherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Richard,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They might not go away permanently, but I think solutions like the Spore Creature Creator go a long way to mitigate them. That is a brilliantly designed CAD program that allows a total novice to create something with no training, but also allows a pro to create amazing objects that the designers of the program never imagined (&lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/10nrXs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/10nrXs&lt;/a&gt;). I think all of the barriers i mentioned can be similarly addressed via design or product management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>They might not go away permanently, but I think solutions like the Spore Creature Creator go a long way to mitigate them. That is a brilliantly designed CAD program that allows a total novice to create something with no training, but also allows a pro to create amazing objects that the designers of the program never imagined (<a href="http://bit.ly/10nrXs" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/10nrXs</a>). I think all of the barriers i mentioned can be similarly addressed via design or product management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Sewell</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-792</guid>
		<description>I agree, and I certainly don&#039;t want to start an argument over definitions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I do think that the problems you&#039;ve described will never really go away - the customer will never become the designer. If these technologies are going to become mainstream, it will be because business models arise in which the customer can do some useful personalisation without having to do design work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just can&#039;t imagine what those business models might be, and I wish I could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, and I certainly don&#39;t want to start an argument over definitions. </p>
<p>But I do think that the problems you&#39;ve described will never really go away &#8211; the customer will never become the designer. If these technologies are going to become mainstream, it will be because business models arise in which the customer can do some useful personalisation without having to do design work.</p>
<p>I just can&#39;t imagine what those business models might be, and I wish I could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Flaherty</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Flaherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Richard,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it becomes an issue of semantics at some point, though the issues still pertain to your definition of customization. Take the company ProperCloth. They are mass customizing dress shirts. They are nice shirts and the site is well designed, but are also more expensive than normal and clothing is an area most men would like to leave to pros. I don&#039;t think each problem will apply to every product category. It is just an interesting list to consider when designing customization services, however you define them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>I think it becomes an issue of semantics at some point, though the issues still pertain to your definition of customization. Take the company ProperCloth. They are mass customizing dress shirts. They are nice shirts and the site is well designed, but are also more expensive than normal and clothing is an area most men would like to leave to pros. I don&#39;t think each problem will apply to every product category. It is just an interesting list to consider when designing customization services, however you define them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Sewell</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-784</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that most of these examples aren&#039;t exactly customisation. Or, at least, aren&#039;t what I think of as customisation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Services like Shapeways and Ponoko are really about creation - the user designs the whole thing, and the service does the making. And, as you say, that&#039;s hard for a user to exploit without expending a lot of design effort.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I imagine when I think about customisation is something more like (for example) custom-fitted clothing, where the overall design is taken care of by the manufacturer but each pair of trousers is actually made for the measurements of a particular customer.  That&#039;s the kind of business that can (in principle) exploit the new manufacturing technologies to do a better job in the old markets. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am ashamed to say I can&#039;t find any good examples outside of clothing. There seem to be a bunch of custom-shirt and custom-jeans companies, who are presumably using laser cutting and old-fashioned sewing, but nothign else. Are they out there somewhere ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you know if anyone is actually doing any of that ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that most of these examples aren&#39;t exactly customisation. Or, at least, aren&#39;t what I think of as customisation. </p>
<p>Services like Shapeways and Ponoko are really about creation &#8211; the user designs the whole thing, and the service does the making. And, as you say, that&#39;s hard for a user to exploit without expending a lot of design effort.</p>
<p>What I imagine when I think about customisation is something more like (for example) custom-fitted clothing, where the overall design is taken care of by the manufacturer but each pair of trousers is actually made for the measurements of a particular customer.  That&#39;s the kind of business that can (in principle) exploit the new manufacturing technologies to do a better job in the old markets. </p>
<p>I am ashamed to say I can&#39;t find any good examples outside of clothing. There seem to be a bunch of custom-shirt and custom-jeans companies, who are presumably using laser cutting and old-fashioned sewing, but nothign else. Are they out there somewhere ?</p>
<p>Do you know if anyone is actually doing any of that ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Flaherty</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Flaherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 08:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-781</guid>
		<description>I think those gains and even greater ones can be achieved and made commercial, but I don&#039;t think many companies have hit the step function in terms of value creation yet. I think Shapeways and Ponoko have certainly hit that value creation level for the serious hobbyist. Access to expensive capital machines had always been a nightmare of RFQ&#039;s and you guys made it as easy as shopping at Amazon. Now the challenge is to design products that deliver the same value to mass market consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think those gains and even greater ones can be achieved and made commercial, but I don&#39;t think many companies have hit the step function in terms of value creation yet. I think Shapeways and Ponoko have certainly hit that value creation level for the serious hobbyist. Access to expensive capital machines had always been a nightmare of RFQ&#39;s and you guys made it as easy as shopping at Amazon. Now the challenge is to design products that deliver the same value to mass market consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joris</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>joris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-779</guid>
		<description>I agree, with the &quot;rather incremental gain&quot; this is a huge issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, with the &#8220;rather incremental gain&#8221; this is a huge issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jseliger</title>
		<link>http://replicatorinc.com/blog/2009/05/why-mass-customization-isnt-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>jseliger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://replicatorinc.com/blog/?p=740#comment-778</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;People don&#039;t want millions of options, they just want the exact product they want&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is good advice. I feel the same way about books, but the problem is that you often don&#039;t know what the exact book you want to read is until after you&#039;ve read it. Certainly that was &lt;a href=&quot;http://jseliger.com/2008/02/11/the-name-of-the-rose/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my experience&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;em&gt;The Name of the Rose&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;People don&#39;t want millions of options, they just want the exact product they want&#8221;</i></p>
<p>This is good advice. I feel the same way about books, but the problem is that you often don&#39;t know what the exact book you want to read is until after you&#39;ve read it. Certainly that was <a href="http://jseliger.com/2008/02/11/the-name-of-the-rose/" rel="nofollow">my experience</a> with <em>The Name of the Rose</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

